After Rallye Report

Alice’s Adventures in Rallyeland

The coursemarkers are down and the results out but here are a few more words on the event.  First off, I'd like to everyone who helped with the May 7th, 2005 rallye, “Alice’s Adventures in Rallyeland.”  These included Steve Beuerman who pre-checked, Larry Friedrich who pre-checked, worked the checkpoint, Ken Schott who did the rallye school, helped post the CMs and scored the event, Steve Watt who printed the instructions, organized the protest committee, and who along with Nancy Hanna, pre-checked the rallye.  Wayne Stilwell helped at the checkpoint.  I'd also like to thank Ken Schott for preparing the Participation Fridge Magnets and for handling the awards.  Last, but not least, I'd like to thank the 28 cars that decided to run a gimmick rallye on a dark and stormy night.

A few words about the actual rallye.  Rich Berlin and Brian Anderson presented this rallye as their first in 1989.  Even though the rallye had problems back then, including downed CMs, I thought it was fun to run and definitely worth presenting again. 

You might think re-throwing a rallye is easy and saves considerable time.  Not so! The original GIs were reworked and reorganized to better support the gimmicks envisioned by the original rallyemasters.  Much of the Critique was rewritten and expanded to better explain the gimmicks and describe what should have been done along the route.  Since the gimmicks were convoluted and often stacked, several CMs were added to cover alternate interpretations and give partial credit.  Many of the negative point CMs were changed to zero points. Some gimmicks had to be moved like the on course CM that brought three Supp 8s into effect because the old streets became one way or private.  Also, I thought the original rallye was a bit long so a few gimmicks were eliminated and the course shortened.

This rallye had more then the usual number of pre-checks and still we missed things.  For example, by correctly counting Opps to do RI 30 (4th Opp) you would be back at the same intersection where you had done RI 29. (The two RIs at the same intersection is called an Aristotle.)  The original RMs and pre-checks missed this.  I missed it along with the 3 master experts and 2 experts that did my pre-checks.  Sorry.

The coursemarkers (CMs) were posted using the same cardstock, equipment, and tape as we have done on previous rallyes. Many similar, if not identical, concrete lamp posts were used.  On our last two events, also in Sunnyvale, we had no downed CMs but this time they were dropping like flies.

Sometimes things change on the route itself.  For instance, the street signs at Nobili and Monroe were up, came down, and were replaced all during the pre-check phase. I took a chance that a missing street sign might appear on Machado at Del Monte.  Just in case, I mentioned this in an SI at the Start.  Later, I got three cell phone calls saying the gimmick did not work because the sign was missing.  Do all seniors and experts read the SIs at the Start?  Apparently not.

I do, however, offer a very sincere apology to all who were inconvenienced by the holes in the GIs we failed to catch, the downed CMs, a queen with CRI 18 (should have been 19), and the missing Aristotle.  It is embarrassing for me that one of the CMs was made with the wrong number- M 32 was posted as M 13.  I hope that the protests corrected these problems to everyone’s satisfaction.

There were 11 protests filed on a variety of gimmicks.  Since several CMs were down, everyone was given credit for CM BB (+20) and no one was penalized for taking CM M (-10).  Some protests were granted for single cars including CM KK for cars that caught the missing Aristotle. One was granted for considering the Drink Me instruction to be part of the GI instruction in the Order of Precedence when the digit 4 disappeared but only if the car also had CM E.  Another went to a car regarding bringing the RIs back into effect.  An “as close as possible” protest went to a car for the CRI at Georgetown gimmick. Some protests were denied including one for a supposedly downed on course CM (AG) and another regarding words and punctuation (T Intersection).  All of these protests were filed on the new TRC protest forms. We hope these forms will expedite the process by getting the required information and clearly written arguments.

In addition to this 1989 rallye, Rich Berlin and Brian Anderson wrote a second rallye based on Alice through the Looking Glass that featured even more unusual concepts. I’m wondering if I should consider presenting it in the future.  Please let me know if there was enough worthwhile substance in “Alice” to entice you out for another event.

-Bob Schott, Rallyemaster.

 

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alice's Adventures in Rallyeland Results

May 7, 2005

The maximum possible score is 1000.

Classes: Ft=First Timer, Bg=Beginner, Nv=Novice, Sr=Senior, Ex=Expert, Me = Master Expert

Place: T = Trophied, X = Won NCSCC Christmas Tree award

 

Class

Car

Points

Place

Driver

Club

Navigator

Club

Passengers

Ft

19

756

1T

Chris Ice

 

Diane Palme

 

Ft

3

666

2T

Frank Bonita

Marilyn Bonita

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bg

24

800

1T

William Discipio

William T. Discipio

 

Bg

16

786

2T

Grant Toeppen

Chris Toeppen

 

Bg

13

786

3T

Erin Watson

David Kendahl

 

Bg

23

716

 

Tim McCrone

Bill McCrone

 

Bg

25

694

 

Ras Sheffield

Al Strest

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nv

12

866

1T

Lorraine Kobyluk

Casey Kobyluk

TRC

 

Nv

22

846

2T

Rebekah Reinagel

Nathan Johnson

Bethany, Charity

Nv

21

844

3T

Cyndel Podich

Dave Fladlien

TRC

Kristine Podich,

Ackilles Gagliano

Nv

20

836

 

Doris Fung

TRC/

SCCA/

BMW

Mike Hsu

TRC/

SCCA/

BMW

Nv

9

826

 

Neal Kimmey

TRC

Gary Watcon

TRC

Campyn Skypoodle

Nv

17

726

 

Marcos Ybarra

Michael Walling

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sr

27

896

1T

Mike Davis

TRC

Heidi Davis

TRC

Kyle, Parker

Sr

14

886

2T

Cynthia Reinagel

TRC

Josiah Reinagel

Caleb Reinagel

Sr

26

876

 

Keith Anderson

TRC

Kim Anderson

TRC

Cory Anderson,

Cole Anderson

Sr

28

866

 

Greg Wong

TRC

Karen Cate

Burt Foland

Sr

2

864

 

Bob Cunningham

TRC

Christy Cunningham

TRC

 

Sr

15

860

 

Rolf Kliso

 

Dean Stanton

TRC

Melissa Stanton

Sr

18

846

 

Trevor Graham

TRC

Kim Graham

 

Sr

8

836

 

Kathy Amaya

David Koreski

TRC

David Anderson,

Andrew Short

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ex

5

960

1T

Beth Riggs

TRC

Brian Underwood

TRC

Adam Riggs

Ex

7

940

2T

Nick Stefanisko

TRC

Teresa Stefanisko

TRC

Zak

Ex

1

920

 

Tara Landry

Jeremy Bagai

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Me

11

980

1TX

John Fabela

TRC

Bill Jonesi

TRC

 

Me

4

940

2T

Darin McGrew

TRC

Michelle McGrew

TRC

Woof

Me

6

910

 

Brian Mattal

Andy Lerner

TRC

 

Me

10

DNF

 

Al Blazick

OSCA

Lee Medeiros

TRC/OSCA

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CM

1st Timer

Beginner

Novice

Senior

Expert

Master

Over All

A

0

0

0

0

0

1 (25%)

1 (4%)

AA

0

1 (20%)

1 (17%)

3 (38%)

3 (100%)

1 (25%)

9 (32%)

AB

2 (100%)

4 (80%)

4 (67%)

8 (100%)

3 (100%)

3 (75%)

24 (86%)

AC

2 (100%)

3 (60%)

6 (100%)

8 (100%)

3 (100%)

3 (75%)

25 (89%)

AD

1 (50%)

5 (100%)

6 (100%)

8 (100%)

3 (100%)

3 (75%)

26 (93%)

AE

2 (100%)

5 (100%)

6 (100%)

8 (100%)

3 (100%)

3 (75%)

27 (96%)

AF

2 (100%)

3 (60%)

6 (100%)

8 (100%)

3 (100%)

3 (75%)

25 (89%)

AG

1 (50%)

2 (40%)

4 (67%)

6 (75%)

3 (100%)

1 (25%)

17 (61%)

AL

1 (50%)

0

1 (17%)

0

0

3 (75%)

5 (18%)

AP

0

0

0

0

0

2 (50%)

2 (7%)

AX

0

2 (40%)

2 (33%)

3 (38%)

3 (100%)

2 (50%)

12 (43%)

AY

0

1 (20%)

6 (100%)

8 (100%)

3 (100%)

4 (100%)

22 (79%)

AZ

0

0

2 (33%)

4 (50%)

2 (67%)

4 (100%)

12 (43%)

B

0

1 (20%)

0

0

0

0

1 (4%)

BB

0

0

1 (17%)

1 (13%)

1 (33%)

3 (75%)

6 (21%)

C

0

2 (40%)

1 (17%)

1 (13%)

0

0

4 (14%)

CC

1 (50%)

4 (80%)

5 (83%)

7 (88%)

3 (100%)

3 (75%)

23 (82%)

CP1

0

3 (60%)

4 (67%)

7 (88%)

3 (100%)

4 (100%)

21 (75%)

CP10

2 (100%)

5 (100%)

5 (83%)

8 (100%)

3 (100%)

4 (100%)

27 (96%)

CP11

2 (100%)

5 (100%)

5 (83%)

8 (100%)

3 (100%)

4 (100%)

27 (96%)

CP13

1 (50%)

3 (60%)

5 (83%)

8 (100%)

3 (100%)

4 (100%)

24 (86%)

CP2

0

2 (40%)

5 (83%)

6 (75%)

3 (100%)

4 (100%)

20 (71%)

CP3

0

0

0

4 (50%)

3 (100%)

4 (100%)

11 (39%)

CP4

2 (100%)

5 (100%)

6 (100%)

8 (100%)

3 (100%)

4 (100%)

28 (100%)

CP8

2 (100%)

4 (80%)

5 (83%)

8 (100%)

3 (100%)

4 (100%)

26 (93%)

CP9

2 (100%)

5 (100%)

5 (83%)

8 (100%)

3 (100%)

4 (100%)

27 (96%)

D

0

1 (20%)

0

0

0

0

1 (4%)

DD

1 (50%)

2 (40%)

5 (83%)

8 (100%)

3 (100%)

4 (100%)

23 (82%)

E

2 (100%)

5 (100%)

6 (100%)

8 (100%)

0

0

21 (75%)

EE

0

0

0

0

1 (33%)

2 (50%)

3 (11%)

F

0

0

0

0

1 (33%)

0

1 (4%)

G

0

2 (40%)

5 (83%)

8 (100%)

2 (67%)

0

17 (61%)

H

1 (50%)

0

1 (17%)

1 (13%)

0

0

3 (11%)

HH

0

0

3 (50%)

6 (75%)

2 (67%)

1 (25%)

12 (43%)

I

2 (100%)

4 (80%)

3 (50%)

3 (38%)

1 (33%)

1 (25%)

14 (50%)

II

0

0

0

0

0

2 (50%)

2 (7%)

J

1 (50%)

5 (100%)

3 (50%)

2 (25%)

0

0

11 (39%)

K

0

1 (20%)

1 (17%)

1 (13%)

0

0

3 (11%)

KK

1 (50%)

4 (80%)

2 (33%)

8 (100%)

3 (100%)

4 (100%)

22 (79%)

L

0

1 (20%)

1 (17%)

0

0

0

2 (7%)

LL